On Our Mind: Criticisms of The Bulletin's coverage

Cartoon by Taryn Trousdale

Everyone knows that the most important aspect of a newspaper is its audience: the readers. Here at The Bulletin, we work hard to make our readers happy. Despite the occasional mistakes that come from the fact that all of us are imperfect people, we feel that we’re doing a fairly good job at producing the best news that we can for our readers.

Something we’ve come to notice recently is that some of our readers don’t seem to appreciate all of our efforts. In fact, The Bulletin staff has worked hard to heed the suggestions and even harsh criticism of the Emporia State community, perhaps more than ever, within the last year.

We have no trouble conceding to the fact that in years past our content, layout and reporting have left something to be desired. Consequently, we have worked from the bottom up to transform The Bulletin into a valid, respected publication.

Nearly three years ago we printed a survey on the back page of The Bulletin and asked our readers to respond. They did and an overwhelming majority of those responding said they wanted more hard-hitting news and news that would make changes on campus.

We have worked hard since then to cover more important issues and to work to make change on campus. We have done this through various changes to the newspaper.

These changes have occurred within the writing, photography and overall design of The Bulletin. We feel that in the last year, our material has become much more relevant and more equally representative of all students on campus.

Yet it would seem as though some people are dramatically opposed to the changes that we have made, especially in terms of reporting. We have been disappointed many times to find that some members of the ESU community do not seem to have any desire to gain a deeper understanding of their surroundings.

In our numerous attempts to report with integrity, timeliness and professionalism, we have been consistently criticized for our dedication to writing newsworthy material. It would seem as though, despite our best efforts to please our readers, some people simply enjoy finding something to complain about.

There are others, however, who have noticed the changes that we have worked so diligently to make and appreciate our commitment to integrity, and those are the readers for whom we will continue to strive toward excellence.

We would like to sincerely thank all of those who have supported us throughout the past year as we have worked to improve this publication. We look forward to continuing to serve and represent this community in an accurate and straightforward manner.

34 Responses to "On Our Mind: Criticisms of The Bulletin's coverage"


I object to the fattys, poopers, and soy bombs that are roaming the halls of ESU. Oh, and the Bulletin serves no better purpose than to line the bottom of my cat's little box.
That's funny, Boooooo!
April 14, 2008 9:42 am
You have nothing better to do than to troll the online Bulletin, then? Really? Sucks to be you.
I have to say I've been amazed at what the Bulletin has accomplished recently, specifically during this school year. However, Harrison George in a man-thong is not, and never will be, front page above-the-fold news.
i agree with impressed with everything INCLUDING the man-thong.
The Bulletin has a reputation of apathy that dates back to the days when ESU was KSTC. Put bluntly, not one of the current editors has the nerve to challenge some of the folks that are running ESU into the dirst. It takes guts and vision to hold an administrator's feet to the fire and I am afraid the current staff has neither.
The Bulletin has gotten much better since the Diversions editor left. His stuff was crap and a waste of space in the paper. At least A&E and Opinion have gotten a little better.
A & E kicks A$$
If only the Bulletin would expend as much energy in being accurate and maintaining ethical standards as it does in trying to inflame the public!

Just within the past three issues, the following have been noted:

- an article written under the byline of someone who had not spoken with, nor even attended the meeting where the quotes were secured. Sure seems like you might want to have have a 'reporter' attending meetings before trying to write about them using second-hand information supplied by someone else;

- an article that is entirely wrong with regard to a major campus initiative. The errors were so numerous and so egregious that it's difficult to imagine that they were not intentional. It's usually better to ascribe errors to ignorance rather than malice, but in this instance, that practice will be difficult to defend;

- blatantly false and misleading editorial statements, apparently made for the sole intention of fanning flames of controversy.

In the long run, none of these issues really matter to me at all. But educational malfeasance does matter, and the abilities and predilictions shown recently by Bulletin staff members call into serious question the level of their training.

Finally, would someone please take time to check with the Student Press Law Center, The A.G.'s office, Lyon County Prosecutor, or ANYONE and see what suggestions they might offer concerning the importance of truthful, accurate and unbiased reporting?

Bulletin staff, your hypocrisy is fairly overwhelming. We don't ask much, but would it kill you to actually get one or two facts straight in an article? May not create as much controversy -- which appears to be your primary reason for existence -- but it's possible that you may actually learn something about your craft.
If casual observer is a faculty member, I believe he is just mad because things are not going his way. If CO is not a faculty member, how do you know that the Bulletin has and has not done. Provide the facts all knowing casual observer, and until you do such, your comments are just as good as their shotty reporting.
grad student who agrees with Casual Observer
April 15, 2008 6:30 pm
I'm a grad student which means I've had the "pleasure" of reading the Bulletin for 6+ years. You don't have to be a faculty member to see that they suck.
And it's available to community members.
Cold, Hard Evidence
April 15, 2008 11:09 pm
If people so question the facts behind the articles, why don't they ask for the evidence? I believe the reporter uses a tape recorder for all interviews.

Don't be so quick to judge the integrity of individual student journalists who seek only to expose the student body to truth.

Obviously the faculty has done something wrong, otherwise they would not be trying oh so desperately to cover their asses and accuse people who are putting facts into print.

Casual Observer: perhaps you could list these specific misrepresentations written by the "hypocritical" staff of The Bulletin. I'm sure there is evidence that these "misrepresentations" are, in actuality, truth.
Not buying the BS
April 16, 2008 9:15 am
It comes to me as quite the surprise that the bulletin is worried about being criticized, when it has become apparent that a certain author plagiarized the words of a faculty member. It should be a punishable offense, but instead it gets ignored. Let the bulletin play all the defense it wants against certain issues but the way Ms. Ryan took the words of one of the professors out of context will never get addressed.
Nice job accusing Ms. Ryan of plagiarizing words Hillary.
how does someone even know if the words were taken out of context? do you have a transcript of the conversation? my guess is no. if you're so apt to address it, you should state exactly which words were taken out of context
The staff of the Bulletin have misquoted a number of people. One reporter interviewed me and when she was writing my quotes she stopped and put... I could only assume that she was going to fill in the blank spots with her own words. WHICH SHE DID. They don't always tape their interviews.
i've been taped
April 16, 2008 2:13 pm
if you had these concerns when she wrote "..." why didn't you address the issue at the time? take initiative
how does one plagiarize a quote? lol Not Buying the BS doesn't know what they're talking about
you've been taped...
April 16, 2008 10:15 pm
you are right I should have taken initiative but it was an ackward situation as I was a professional who relied on the Bulletin to be professional. I guess that was mistake number 2.
Well, actually, the mistake was probably when you started throwing a bitch fit to cover your own ass. Nice try, but calling someone else a liar doesn't make you less of one. They taught you that in kindergarten, moron.

Maybe if you spent more time worrying about your own job and less time criticizing everyone else's, you wouldn't be so miserable.

GET A LIFE.
tape this! you work for the bulletin. I understand your need to protect your job. But we both know that there are people that ruin it for the whole bunch. So don't try and say people are lying at the staff when you have no way of possibly monitoring every person on the staff.
Dude...how do you lie at people?

I love how someone who works at the paper can't monitor everyone on the staff but someone who doesn't can...

Awesome.
I agree, if the Bulletin staff cannot monitor all of its members, then what makes anyone think that the general public can? Thats just too funny. Unless every member of the bulletin has their own personal stalker taping their every move, its imposible to say. If that is the case I would never want to work there.
I think the Bulletin has done a great job and they deserve some praise!
I have not monitored every single person on staff either. I commented about one staff person in a situation where I was clearly involved. You are the one stating it didn't happen. Are you the stalker that follows their every move?
And if it comes to making fun of the grammatical errors on my post, then I've clearly won my argument.
There's a difference between grammatical errors and you being an idiot, but clearly you wouldn't know that.
Name calling occurs when you run out of valuable things to say. Most people just stop but clearly you are not one of those people that knows when to quit.
Whadda Ny Scartoon
April 18, 2008 2:56 pm
Taryn has got to best the best artist 'round!
As many of you already know, ESU alums are not finding jobs and many of us are homeless. ESU, as many of us are now finding out, has a really bad reputation amongst employers in the region. Many of you should transfer now before you too are homeless and without a chance. I have resorted to using pieces of my diploma to wipe my sensitive behind.

Perhaps the Bulletin could do a story on why ESU is considering adding new living quarters for its record high homeless alums.
perhaps you lazy alums are to blame for you not finding jobs. it isn't the university, it could also be the fact you are too worthless to search for ajob and get off your butt and do something...what's your resume look like anyway?
Does this have anything to do with the actual topic at hand?
yeah that is not even on topic. obviously you have trouble following along. could be why you don't have a job. just saying....
Homeboy be homeless
April 20, 2008 9:32 pm
First of all, ESU would be the first to blame for the unfortunate situation that my homeless brethren are in. Try getting carreer services to assist you and then talk to us about how worthless ESU is on these matters. The whole school is on the brink of crumbling under the unimaginable weight of its homeless alums. No one wants to face the hard truth: there just isn't a damn thing a degree from ESU is good for. Besides that, ESU hires the crappiest professors because all the good ones migrate to better schools. Furthermore, ESU is notorious for hiring within because everyone else who might be qualified ends up taking other jobs. It's really quite sick.
ESU alum with a job
April 21, 2008 12:37 pm
A degree is a degree, no matter where it's from. What matters is GPA, relevant experience, GRE scores, etc. I would like to know how high these things were for those blaming ESU for not being able to find a job
Oh no, I got the shits. I'll have to respond when I have a little more time on my hands.

Peace out!